This little study is pretty revealing, on a number of levels.
Speaking for myself, you know, I’m not a wealth redistributionist. If that’s a word.
Not as a matter of politics, anyway.
On the other hand, I thoroughly approve of, and have brought about on a number of occasions, wealth redistribution on an individual level, to remedy an individual injustice of some kind. In a successful personal injury lawsuit, for example, money is taken from an insurance company and paid to an injured person to compensate for the injury. In other situations you might have an employee wronged in some way by an employer and the employer pays to compensate. Or you might have a breach of contract where the breacher is ordered to compensate the other party.
In fact as you might have just gleaned, one of the primary functions of any justice system is to transfer wealth - from the wrongdoers to the wronged.
Now, you don’t necessarily have an imbalance of wealth in the social sense (and if you didn’t read the linked article, it contains proof that wealth in the United States is extremely imbalanced) solely, or even primarily, because the justice system is failing. Or even at all. There could be other reasons.
But it’s also true to say that an extreme imbalance in wealth distribution is consistent with a failing justice system. I am not the only one who thinks so. It would be legitimate to suspect, then, that a justice system is failing when there is an extreme imbalance of wealth. The conclusion that the justice system is failing is made more likely if there are other indicators that the justice system has problems. Do we have other indications of that in the US?