Puzzle Palace Is All Over You

Back in the day, when I was personally a key component of national defense being a naval officer and all, the National Security Agency was routinely referred to as the “puzzle palace”.  I never hear that term for it anymore.  But of course Wikipedia doesn’t miss a trick.

In any case, this was certainly foreseeable.  I more or less assume and have assumed for years that they collect and store everything, or so much of everything as is within their capacity.  As I think I’ve said elsewhere, we were drowning in intelligence information 30 years ago, and for all I know 75 years ago, at least in the sense that it’s not gathering the information that’s a problem; it’s analyzing it such that you can do anything useful with it when it matters – before something happens, not after.

I get the civil liberties concerns better than I used to (I have to confess, there was a time I would have thought this kind of capability was simply too cool and little else), because the primary use of this torrent of information will be the easiest:  it won’t prevent anything or even be all that helpful in catching anyone, but once they’ve done something and you’ve caught them due to entirely independent resources, it will help you convict them, because of course the data is in there somewhere.

And, oh, don’t forget the other easy thing:  once Obama W Hillary whomever decides they don’t like you there’s a lot of stuff they can dig up.

Of course, they’d have to have the correct clearance: confidential, secret, top secret, etc.  And the “need to know” for legitimate operational reasons.  I mean, those are still the rules, aren’t they?

You have to love the code name of the program, too:  PRISM  I wonder what it stands for?  Someone at the puzzle palace could probably tell me, but then…..they’d have to kill me.



Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “Puzzle Palace Is All Over You

  1. Buck Eschaton

    I saw this article and the phone sex connection, and I thought about the recent Jodi Arias discussions on this blog. I guess we might never know if someone was listening to their conversations. I guess we don’t know about a lot anymore.


  2. lawmrh

    Lots of angles to this story besides the meaning of PRISM — which really doesn’t interest me all that much. I was more shocked about how overpaid Edward Snowden was at a reported $200,000 per year. Outrageous.
    See link below.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s